View Single Post
  #8  
Old 16-06-2015, 09:53 PM
clive milne
Registered User

clive milne is offline
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Freo WA
Posts: 1,443
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shiraz View Post
Hi Clive. I suspect that the only "law" that could reasonably be derived by the rest of us might be that there are three numbers - with only one observation, pretty much everything else is up for grabs.
.
Excellent Ray, I was hoping you would have a crack at this.

To answer your question
You have as many observations as you wish, and 'the law' is consistent

Quote:
So my submission is -14, 1.74e17 and 0
In the interests of others, I'll pm you as to whether these 3 numbers are consistent with the law (or not)

Quote:
Then again, I might be misreading the question..

That is getting to the crux of it.
Reply With Quote