Quote:
Originally Posted by strongmanmike
Yeah not too bad really Louie has all the basics, the seeing clearly wasn't on your side...makes a lot of difference to the final product. Was the seeing bad for the whole 20hrs?...man that sucks 
Mike |
Yeah thanks Mike....lot easier shooting with the FSQ which didn't care too much about the seeing...still,more fun with the RC.
April's 6 hrs of luminance was the good data coming in at 1.76" to 2.49" as read by CCD Inspector.
That saved this image I think.....all the rest came in at 2.5" to 4.5" but hey that's the way the cookie crumbles
couldn't care less to tell you the truth....just do this for fun
