View Single Post
  #13  
Old 21-03-2012, 06:21 PM
mithrandir's Avatar
mithrandir (Andrew)
Registered User

mithrandir is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Glenhaven
Posts: 4,161
Quote:
Originally Posted by cventer View Post
Thanks everyone. Looks like alignment to scope is not the issue. Guess I need to track down what else this might be.

can someone also help with this questions. I am having a brain fart day and cant seem to solve th emost basic of maths problems.

My guidescope scale is 3.57 arc sec per pixel

My Scope and Camera is 2.8 arc sec pr pixel

If guide scope moves 1 pixel or 1/2 a pixel what movement in pixels or arc sec is this on my main imagers ccd chip ?
Chris,

1/2 guider pixel = 3.57/2/2.8 = 0.64 imager pixel

similarly 1 guider pixel = 1.28 imager pixel

PHD can guide at an effective value of around 0.1 pixel if the guide star covers more than 1 pixel, so a slightly defocused star normally works better.

It uses the light falling on the adjacent pixels to calculate the centroid. If all the light is on one pixel it can tell where on the pixel it falls, so can't do anything until it starts appearing in an adjacent pixel.

I wish the weekend weather would improve so I can practice what I preach.
Reply With Quote