View Single Post
  #12  
Old 02-06-2015, 10:55 PM
Eden's Avatar
Eden (Brett)
Registered Rambler

Eden is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 399
When considering star size in photography -- especially long-exposure photography -- it is important to account for ultra-violet starlight, particularly between 300-400nm.

Light at these wavelengths is not absorbed by the Earth's atmosphere (in fact, the atmosphere does not completely absorb light between 280-300nm) and is more susceptible to atmospheric diffraction compared to light at longer wavelengths. This very fact alone will cause a star to become "bloated" over the course of a long exposure.

For most observers, this light is not visible to the human eye but is readily picked up by unfiltered monochrome CCDs and indeed color CCDs not equipped with a UV blocking window.

Choice of CCD sensor will almost certainly have an impact on star size when these wavelengths are not properly restricted. For example, a KAF16803 has an approximate QE between ~25% (350nm) and ~40% (400nm), whereas an ICX694 is much more sensitive to UV light, with sensitivity ranging from ~30% (350nm) to ~65% (at 400nm).
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (QE_PBernhard.jpg)
178.5 KB57 views
Reply With Quote