Quote:
Originally Posted by multiweb
I reckon it should be a small fee per image based on file size on disk and resolution. Forget the yearly fees and premium vs. whatever else. Then his cashflow will be more in line with the resources needed to host the service both in term of traffic and storage.
|
Good idea Marc. The current restrictions are for jpg sized files. As folks migrate to larger format camera sensors, file RAW sizes get pretty big, and thus reduction is needed to get them on Astrobin, and currently people just stick on links to off Astrobin hosts for full resolution viewing. I believe this has driven very experienced imagers to eschew Astrobin for other hosting arrangements, essentially Cloud based.