View Single Post
  #6  
Old 02-10-2013, 02:26 PM
gregbradley's Avatar
gregbradley
Registered User

gregbradley is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 17,903
I agree with H. I'd go the 200mm F2.8 prime. Bound to be the better lens.

Sigma 70-200mm 2.8 gets good reviews but its getting pretty large and heavy and zooms are often a compromise. For astro work you really want little chromatic aberration wide open and no coma wide open as an ideal.

You can use stop down rings to achieve a higher F ratio and not get diffraction spikes.

Cheaper choices are Pentax 67 300mm, 200mm. I use a Pentax 67 165mm F2.8 and its spectacular wide open on a huge 16803 chip. A cheap $30 ebay adapter and you are away. The 165mm lens costs hardly anything on Ebay.

Greg.
Reply With Quote