|
My understanding is Decon works better on oversampled data -it gives the algorithim something to bite on.
I see that with Trius data from the CDK. It does take decon quite nicely without artifacts (so long as not overdone).
Like any sharpening tool easily overdone. But several layers of different decon strength is a very useful tool in bringing out galaxy data. I don't see a conflict in that its merely sharpening. Much like using unsharp mask (gasp - does anyone use that anymore??).
Greg.
|