View Single Post
  #6  
Old 02-09-2013, 05:48 PM
gregbradley's Avatar
gregbradley
Registered User

gregbradley is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 17,897
Yes I thought the example was pretty extreme. But the point remains that traditional autoguiders in poor seeing can easily chase the seeing. So a correction is issued to the mount only because the seeing shifted the star not PE from the mount.

It may mean less seeing related corrections and more corrections that are PE based. Its not the guide exposures I am interested in its the more accurate tracking in poorer seeing for the imaging camera that I am interested in. It could be hogwash hence the test.

Anyways. I'll conduct a test and post the results. I have to get a filter first.

Greg.
Reply With Quote