View Single Post
  #30  
Old 27-10-2020, 09:12 AM
The_bluester's Avatar
The_bluester (Paul)
Registered User

The_bluester is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Kilmore, Australia
Posts: 3,342
The CDK stars ones look much more natural than the stars in that 127mm image to me, those look very much like what I saw when I gave the AI sharpening routine a try. At a very low level of sharpening they lost the gradual fading that comes out of normal seeing and became hard, flat blobs, I found it a very unattractive look, it also produced artifacts very quickly and not just sharpening worms in the background areas. A few small patterns of stars suddenly looked like someone had dropped text X's on the image, not nice at all. I also do not find the sharpening result on the nebulosity to look very natural. It would be interesting to do an integration with significantly more more or less data and run the AI sharpen on both to see if it produces the same "Detail" both times.

Similarly the AI denoise just did not produce a natural looking image with my data sets so I uninstalled both in short order.
Reply With Quote