View Single Post
  #2  
Old 20-10-2018, 01:53 PM
gregbradley's Avatar
gregbradley
Registered User

gregbradley is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 17,903
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bart View Post
Finally got some colour for my NGC104 image. Not very much or not as much as I wanted although for now it will have to do. Still struggling with focus, will try to get out under the moon and nail the Temp Compensation and see how that goes.

Details


Telescope: William Optics FLT132

Guide Scope: QHY OAG

Camera: QHY9 Mono @ -20c

Filter Wheel: QHY 7 position Ultra Slim

Filters: QHY 36mm unmounted L R G B HA OIII SII

Guide Camera: QHY5L-II

Mount: AZ-EQ6

Mount Control: EQASCOM

Focusing: SharpSky Pro and Sequence Generator Pro 3 (automated)

Bahtinov Mask: No

Capture Software: Sequence Generator Pro 3

Guiding Software: PHD2

Calibration and Stacking Software: PixInsight

Processing Software: PixInsight

Number and Type of Data Frames: L= 19X300 sec, L =7X120 sec, L= 14x30 sec, R= 10x180 sec, G= 10x180 sec, B= 10x180 sec

Ha= x , SII= x , OIII= x .

Binning: 1x1

Total Image Time: 206 minutes

Location: Lockleys Observatory B, Tanunda, Sth Australia

Light Box by Exfso


Full Res

http://www.pbase.com/image/168197638
That turned out very well.

With temp compensation I found keeping a log of the temperature and the focus positions and then working out an average number for the shift of focus/ degree C worked pretty well. It does assume focus shifts are linear and they probably are initially then they flatten off (I think or at least they seem to with my scope). Most likely due to a closing of the difference between ambient and the temp of the objective.


For example my CDK17, when the temp difference is more than 1C it will not be spot on focus but once its within .5C it reaches a peak and focus is sharp.

Greg.
Reply With Quote