View Single Post
  #40  
Old 26-04-2010, 12:57 AM
Tandum's Avatar
Tandum (Robin)
Registered User

Tandum is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Wynnum West, Brisbane.
Posts: 4,161
Maybe taking all the stacking and stetching and scopes out of the equation will make it easier to see the difference. These are single 300sec subs of m20 through the same scope on the same night, one is from a mono and the other from a osc.

If you look at the hystograms rather than the images, the monos show more data. I also found a couple of 434 shots using a different mono camera and these also show more data captured. However I miss my OSC and plan to get another sometime.

The original question was is there any difference combining planetary to deep sky lrbg images, probably not, I've found maxim has corrected stacked and aligned all my mono images without a problem.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (osc.jpg)
85.9 KB97 views
Click for full-size image (mono.jpg)
98.6 KB79 views
Click for full-size image (434-osc.jpg)
86.7 KB51 views
Click for full-size image (434-mono.jpg)
90.3 KB48 views

Last edited by Tandum; 26-04-2010 at 04:41 PM. Reason: Clean up text and update images.
Reply With Quote