View Single Post
  #25  
Old 17-12-2018, 06:39 PM
gregbradley's Avatar
gregbradley
Registered User

gregbradley is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 17,897
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter Ward View Post
Not pain Paul, more puzzlement. I am very happy with the data out to the edge of the 16803...with FWHM’s under 1.9 arc sec.

I think Atmos is correct...CCDinspector is not perfect. I can literally change the focus 10 steps (about 1/1000th) in the same location and it gives me a different result.....as to why? A mystery so far.
I found CCD Inspector to give slightly variable results. Mostly the same but yeah sometimes it would shift and you hadn't done anything. I think its good for an overall close collimation but eyepiece on a night of good seeing is the go for that final tweak.


Perhaps CCD Inspector is simply being influenced by seeing when you are getting that close. I know my CDK on a night of poor seeing is unable to be focused. That must affect CCDinspector calculations. I presume its using FWHM calculations to tell.

Greg.
Reply With Quote