|
I know that, very few of my images were stored only there, and no important ones. I, like most people used it more or less purely as a hosting site to get images on the web.
My gripe and that of potentially millions of other users is that they have made this change essentially unannounced and the fee demanded to restore the functionality that used to be free is offensively and prohibitively and unjustifiably high. It is also the same for all users, got half a dozen photos embedded in a forum thread or blog and want them to work again, $400usd a year. Got a "fixit" online with 50 photos, put up to help like minded enthusiasts of your favourite obscure widget, $400usd a year to make it work again. Got a thousand photos embedded on your business website? $400usd a year.
|