View Single Post
Old 29-09-2007, 05:38 PM
Registered User

snowyskiesau is offline
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Geeveston, Tasmania
Posts: 888
Mostly the camera will be used for landscapes, wildlife, that sort of thing so
any lenses I get should be suited for that.
It's just an advantage if they are also suited to astrophotography as well.

The 50mm 1.8 is on the shopping list. Still deciding between a 135mm f2 and the
70-200mm f/4L both are about the same price but the latter might be a better choice for the non astro stuff.
Mind you, it does have a wider FOV than the 135.

Can't afford both dammit!

(And iceman's latest posting from Kulnura shows what a lower cost lens can do - in the hands of someone who knows how to use it.)
Reply With Quote