View Single Post
  #6  
Old 28-09-2020, 09:12 PM
Ryderscope's Avatar
Ryderscope (Rodney)
Registered User

Ryderscope is online now
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Glanmire, NSW
Posts: 2,190
Quote:
Originally Posted by Placidus View Post
All superb Rodney.

Question: Omega Centauri and Crackerjack are in the Milky Way, hence lots of field stars. 47 Tucanae is far from the Milky way, hence few field stars. So far so good. But the Pavo globular is also far from the Milky Way, yet there seem to be lots of field stars. Is that because the Pavo globular is fainter than say 47 Tucanae, and "exposing" to see the globular at its best brings out more field stars?

Best,
Mike
Thanks Mike. We are talking about a brightness range from 3.9 for Omega Centauri to 5.4 for the Pavo Cluster. For the Pavo Cluster I would have stretched the image to bring out the detail in the core of the cluster and the rest of the star field would have come along for the ride. This being the case it would make sense that the background star field is maybe a little more prominent.
Reply With Quote