[gregbradley]

Originally Posted by Andy01

Hi Greg,
That's a lovely field, great colours and some interesting dark nebs there that I havn't seen before.
I might target one of those

Not too sure about the starless technique used though - the starless rendition looks really soft & blurry.
I'm not seeing that result when I use Starnet with terminal.

It looks painterly & pretty but maybe it could be sharper?

Thanks Andy. Yes it is quite soft plus I have to run some noise reduction as it leaves little black dots everywhere there were stars.

When you say run it with terminal - what does terminal mean there?

Originally Posted by graham.hobart

I do like the starless one -like a volcanic jellyfish! vibrant !!

Thanks Graham. This area has a lot more general nebula in it than I thought. The starless version might make some nice wall art.

Originally Posted by Placidus

Lots of things that are new for us in that image, including the dust lane to far right that looks like a Greek Xi. Well done.

Thanks M and T. There is a lot more Ha in this area than I thought.

Originally Posted by IanP

Not the fun of star-less, but the original (with millions of star) is (as usual from you) first class!!!

I Understand. I don't mind the starless but not wanting to use it all the time either.

Greg.