Quote:
Originally Posted by LewisM
I note the distinct lack of true RGB imagery these days - every man and his dog is NB. Thankfully (my opinion), some still do do RGB - be it OSC or filtered - but the vast majority have gone NB - presumably because of the rapid and vapid increase in LP. Nevertheless, I still persevere with an OSC CCD and use PI to eliminate the LP and gradients.
So, do you think more imagers will move away from RGB and just do NB? And do you like NB imagery? (personally - and no offence - I am not a fan of pure NB images. RGB/NB combine is fine, just not pure NB). To me, NOT imaging RGB is stepping away from "respecting the light" (purely IMHO, so no hissy fits  ) |
Hmm respecting the light. I seem to have heard that before somewhere. It keeps coming back to bite me on the butt. See 2011 Malin M42 entry in which David spoke about respecting the light and visibly gesticulating toward my image.
Well it you think about it Lewis, NB is all part of the spectrum of light, even radio is part of the spectrum of radiation which RGB light is seen within. So what is respecting the light or what is True RGB imaging? Aren't we just capturing the part of the spectrum, should we only stick to one part of the spectrum? So long as you respect that part of the spectrum should that not be the criteria?
