Quote:
Originally Posted by Wavytone
<snip>
And FWIW like Stefan, it won't run here in Safari on both of my macs. Apple is pretty good at compliance with standards including HTML5 so I'll suggest the test code is dodgy, at best.
|
If the HTML5 test suite really does have defective coding, then why is Safari the only major browser that can't run the test?
The test suite needs JavaScript to run, so try this fix on the Mac:
http://www.tech-kitten.com/2007/08/3...is-might-help/
If this doesn't work, then here's another test suite to try:
https://web.basemark.com/
The scores are remarkably consistent across browsers and platforms (since they all use the Blink engine):
In Win7 x64:....................engine..... .......CSS........HTML5.....Page Load...Resize
Avant Ultimate (Chrome)...62.0.3202.94...57.86%... 96.58%....93.23%......75.97%
Brave.............................. 63.0.3239.132..57.86%...96.58%....9 3.37%......75.97%
SRWare Iron....................63.0.3300.0 .....57.86%...96.58%....92.91%..... .75.97%
Vivaldi............................ .62.0.3202.97...57.86%...96.58%.... 92.70%......75.97%
In Linux Mint 18.3:
Brave.............................. 63.0.3239.132..57.86%...96.22%....9 2.63%......75.97%
Chromium.......................63.0 .3239.84....57.86%...96.22%....93.2 6%......75.97%
SRWare Iron....................63.0.3300.0 .....57.86%...96.22%....92.16%..... .75.97%
In all of these tests, WebGL 2.0 was turned off by default and the reports begin with a warning that the WebGL 2.0 test could not be run. (Enabling WebGL 2.0 did
not eliminate the warning or change the percentages.)
How do Safari and Edge compare?
- sutekh