View Single Post
  #15  
Old 18-09-2019, 08:16 AM
Don Pensack's Avatar
Don Pensack
Registered User

Don Pensack is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 507
That we all see something different in eyepieces is brought home to me by your post, Alex.
For me, there is so much obnoxious coma in the 13mm T6 at f/5 that I immediately used it with a coma corrector to make it nearly perfect.
At f/4, I woudn't even try to see how it does without a coma corrector since I'd never use it without one at f/5.
And the 14mm SSW, to my eye, has so much spherical aberration of the exit pupil at f/5.75 (coma-corrected f/5) that I cannot even use it. That's an exit pupil of 2.43mm.
In my f/7 scope (exit pupil 2mm) it's still pretty bad.
Perhaps by f/15 (0.93mm exit pupil), that clears up. It's well known that larger exit pupil size makes SAEP less tolerable.

guess the difference in our observing styles is that I would not knowingly use any newtonian scope without a coma corrector, so, for me, I evaluate an eyepiece's performance based on how it works in a newtonian scope WITH a coma corrector. Coma, I can correct, but astigmatism I cannot, so if the eyepiece displays any astigmatism, it goes.
Reply With Quote