View Single Post
  #9  
Old 14-03-2019, 08:22 AM
gregbradley's Avatar
gregbradley
Registered User

gregbradley is online now
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 17,902
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ukastronomer View Post
William Optics are OK! not great
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wavytone View Post
Get one of the TS quad APOs - faster f ratio and no mucking around with flatteners - ready to go out of the box.

Yes it will weigh more.

I have a 70 mm Photoline quad - a nice scope but it is heavy.

A Petzval is similar but typically not as fast because the original aim of the petzval was to function as a telephoto - extending the focal length, and higher f-ratio.
Thanks for that. I have had 2 FSQs and they were great. I might just wait longer and get another one when I have funds. But my intention was more to capture some widefields easily without a full on setup (but it probably would end up somewhat full on).

The TS site is very informative, they seem to run a higher standard on their gear from the manufacturers. Another is selling this scope but theirs is only 1 FPL53 element whereas this one has all FDC100 glass (supposedly as good as FPL53).

Weight is 4kg which is within the ability of a small Tak mount I picked up.

Greg.
Reply With Quote