View Single Post
  #6  
Old 30-11-2007, 10:23 PM
[1ponders]'s Avatar
[1ponders] (Paul)
Retired, damn no pension

[1ponders] is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Obi Obi, Qld
Posts: 18,778
Probably not Mick, though I guess its a matter of perspective. The 135mm really isn't a wide field either which is why I'm looking at the 17-40. Ideally I'd like the 17-40 (true wide field), an 85 (still in the widefield range), 135 (starting to get a bit tight but does a fantastic job of those wider nebula areas in scorpius, sag etc) , and a TAK 60 with focal reducer (definately not widefield ) .

Which reminds me I'd better get tomorrow lotto in.
Reply With Quote