View Single Post
  #36  
Old 28-04-2018, 09:37 AM
foc (Ross)
Registered User

foc is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: ACT
Posts: 208
I have a Matsuyama 32mm 85. I do not think it is nearly as well corrected in the outer 30% compared to a teleview nagler. But it has very good light transmission and it is light and I do not like very heavy eyepieces. It would be well suited for large globular clusters or the Eta Carinae region. It is also a nice low power finder eyepeice if I do not have a finder fitted.

Oddly enough, when using it for looking at star fields, I prefer the view in my GSO 10 inch Dob than my 140mm f7.5 refractor but that might well be because of the effect of the secondary or because my Dob does not have any correction for coma and my expectations are lower. I also enjoy it in my 102mm f8.6 refractor which is a bit more light starved than the 140mm and perhaps benefits from the slower f ratio.
Reply With Quote