View Single Post
  #18  
Old 11-12-2014, 09:25 PM
photosinferno's Avatar
photosinferno (John)
Registered User

photosinferno is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Sydney
Posts: 66
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slawomir View Post
314L has about 20% lower QE but pixels have twice the surface area comparing to 428/460, so I suspect 314L will overall be a bit more sensitive, although that is just a speculation since I do not have experience with Atik 314 camera.

I just think with Atik 460ex you get more out of your setup, since is works fine with 1.25 filters and the weight is the same as for the smaller Atik 428ex and it costs extra to move up if you one day decide that ICX 674 is too small (speaking from my experience).

Anyway, Atik 428 and 460 are both fine cameras and it takes skills and experience to make the most of out them.

Good luck!
Slawomir,
Thanks for your words of advice - much appreciated
The QE of the 428EX is way up there compared to the 314L+ and the Pixel ratio suits my scopes more. I know what you mean about the FOV and that is a consideration however it's a lot more ontop of my original budget for something that I would like but is a'nice' to have as opposed to 'required'.
All I've got to do is source a 428EX and some imaging filters/wheel now

John
Reply With Quote