Subjective in what way?
The telescope, mount and exposure times were identical.
Each instrument was unmodified, and used in a manner that would optimize the shot noise for each camera at 30 seconds.
I have no argument with one camera being optimized in its design to be used for deep sky imaging, and the other for daylight photography....and make no apologies for that.
The roll-over simply highlights the glaring differences in performance in
identical conditions.
If the weather holds, I'll try the same again, but with a back illuminated CCD this time
Quote:
Originally Posted by skwinty
Hi All
IMO the tests are subjective to say the least.
|