View Single Post
  #57  
Old 22-05-2014, 08:42 PM
rcheshire's Avatar
rcheshire (Rowland)
Registered User

rcheshire is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Geelong
Posts: 2,617
I think the PI dcraw options are probably OK. Will dig a little deeper.

The next issue not mentioned in the original post is pixel rejection parameters for calibration frames. I mentioned elsewhere, that because DSLR RAW data is mangled, integration parameters should not vary between frame types - bias, darks and lights, perhaps...

However, I now think, that "no pixel rejection" is a better option, for bias and darks, though bias frames are 'more' linear than darks. What do others think?

Flats are a separate case in terms of combination, but I still wonder if pixel rejection is warranted.

Lights need a degree of pixel rejection because they have been subject to unfriendly light sources - satellites, visual observers green lasers (bless them) cosmic rays and so on.
Reply With Quote