|
I've been giving the canons a furtive glance, not for Astroimaging, but for terestrial use. I notice a 300 EOS, that is about 8.2 megapixel, and $400 or so more costly than the 350. Apart from the fact (I thought) that the 350 replaced to 300, anyone know if the 'new' 300 is much better than the 350?
cheers,
Doug
|