View Single Post
  #29  
Old 21-02-2010, 12:06 PM
Peter Ward's Avatar
Peter Ward
Galaxy hitchhiking guide

Peter Ward is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: The Shire
Posts: 8,112
Quote:
Originally Posted by strongmanmike View Post
Bah!...the self guide feature is a throwback to the old SCT without mirror lock days it is rather overated,
Having a guide sensor that is locked next to the imaging sensor cures so many guiding problems....eg differential flexure, focus sag, optical shifts with gravity and thermal changes etc. Plus being very close to the isoplanic area of the imager, AO signals from a near field internal guider have less error than systems set further away.

Quote:
Originally Posted by strongmanmike View Post
hence the need for the external guide head, hello!! = piggyback guiding again .
Why lessen your guiding options? Self guide, external guide, differential guide (STX) and adaptive optics. Sure guide scopes work, but are a rather limiting, and not inexpensive (guide scope with rigid focuser, mounting rings, mounting plate and a separate guider with its own power supply and cables) solution.

Quote:
Originally Posted by strongmanmike View Post
Look at the enormous plethora of non self guided pin sharp high rsolution award winning pictures out there
Funny, I recall last years "Astrophotographer of the year" using something that had self guide (On ya Martin! )

Quote:
Originally Posted by strongmanmike View Post
Mega cooling (without water, plastic tubes, buckets of ice and pumps)
A note to SBIG users, the manual states NOT to use ice with water cooling. An additional 6 degrees delta T is typical with room temperature systems.

Quote:
Originally Posted by strongmanmike View Post
inert gas filled imaging chambers for no recharging of desicant and no fogging and accurate orthoganal chip placement
Dessicants also work and are easily re-charged by the user.

Loss of gas = return to factory?
Contrary to web misinformation, SBIG actually do set their CCD systems up orthogonally using a dedicated optical test bench.

At the end of the day, you pays your money and take your chances.

There are several excellent CCD manufacturers out there, I'm sure most users are happy with their choices for what ever reasons that are important to them.

Was that OK Fred? Not too much biffo?

Last edited by Peter Ward; 21-02-2010 at 12:33 PM. Reason: whymsical
Reply With Quote