Thanks Dunk, I hope you meant interesting thoughts in a positive sense. Just kidding
With my previous telescope I was sampling the night sky at 1.33 asp, and with 3nm filters I was most of the time undersampling by a small amount in Brisbane. In particular tiny stars looked squarish. Drizzle integration made them nice and round, but I never actually measured whether I got any more detail in extended objects, and if the only improvement was better looking small stars at the expense of a 4 times larger image.
I look forward to reading about your experiments with drizzle integration. It will take a while for PI to process them with drizzle integration if you have a lot of subs, but with drizzle the more subs the merrier (read: better)
