|
I understand your point of view.
With the extender I am not sure it is 2" or bigger to maintain your imaging circle. It might be worth a check.
Yes the FSQ106 and STL11L have been mated together several times and acquired fantastic results. If you can image at 1.65" per pixel this is better than 2.47", just for sharpening value alone. It is all really just a guide but like others have said getting the 106 would be better in the long run.
This is all just current thinking and so long as you don't get blocky stars it really does not matter which sensor you go with. Experts such as Peter Ward, Martin Pugh, Mike Sidonio and Greg Bradley will have more definitive answers for you. They are all members here and I urge you to contact them via PM.
Best of luck with your decisions
|