View Single Post
  #25  
Old 23-02-2013, 08:40 AM
dvj's Avatar
dvj (John)
Registered User

dvj is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: U.S.A
Posts: 755
Here are a few notes from my own experience with the RH200.

First of all, OS ships this unit with no tube rings. A single arm, off-axis mechanical support is wrong if you expect to have any mechanical stability.

A myth: Having tube rings on this telescope does not distort the wave front, or mechanical orthogonal of the system.

The STI guider and lens assembly works like most autoguiders - it measures the centroid of the star image. I use mine on the RH200 without any guiding problems.

Tested: 3nm filters are a no recommend for f/3. Been there, done that. The transmission impact is serious. So much so that my 6nm bandpass shows more nebulae in 600 sec exposures than 1800 sec the exposure through a 3nm filter.

And finally, it's not about wide field, its about very short FL that mandates close attention to the image train, optical collimation, and focus control. It takes a real master to tame the beast.

jg
Reply With Quote