Thank you Bojan for the links. I read Mike McCulloch's brief posts and was intrigued. As he says,
Quote:
|
The variant of inertial-MoND was an inspiration to me, but MoND and MiHsC differ in their predictions and also in that MoND is only an empirical 'fit': it has to be fitted to the data by hand with a constant a0, and there is no physical reason given for it, whereas MiHsC is based on logic, has a good physical reason and predicts well without any arbitrary fitting. This is a profound advantage.
|
It's a good time to be alive, these problems are being looked at harder and harder than ever before. Something's gotta give.
Regards,
Tony Barry
WSAAG