I would generally agree with this - the differences in quality are really only apparent on very good nights. 90% of the time the differences in optical quality amongst any of these wont be apparent as they are all good examples of quality optics. From what I have read the Tak's do have a different production process and physically are plainly different. Whether they are worth the money depends on your pockets and how you value things.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ab1963
I have had two full sets of Fujiyama orthos and the contrast and sharpness is second to none,I have had a Tak 6mm Abbe also and IMHO is no better than the Fuji 6mm and as i have been lead to believe are all made at the same place in Japan just different specs but my problem is i cannot get used to the small fov and/or the er ,Tried obviously as i bought the full set twice just not for me ,The Tak orthos are definitely not worth the extra coin if the 6mm is anything to go by and think that you will be more than happy with the 12.5 Fujiyama as with the 18mm were my favourites out of the set
|