View Single Post
  #9  
Old 07-10-2014, 11:32 PM
PRejto's Avatar
PRejto (Peter)
Registered User

PRejto is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Rylstone, NSW, Australia
Posts: 1,400
Quote:
Originally Posted by rat156 View Post
Hi Peter,

Are you using adaptive dark frames? I use these of a very long DF exposure and get negative numbers for some of the hot pixels.

What software do you use to take your calibration frames?

Flats will not change the sign of the minimum value as the operator is a division.

Attached are two images from a stack of images of C/2013 V5 that I took last night, apart from being two different images, one has been calibrated and one not so, you can see the hot pixel to the left and a bit below the comet? Its value in the uncalibrated image is 65k, and -512 in the calibrated image.

Doesn't seem to matter in the final image though.

Cheers
Stuart
Thanks Stuart! Yes, I did use an adaptive dark subtraction (12 in darks). In the past I've had better results not doing this. I appreciate your explanation for the negative values after calibraton.

Peter
Reply With Quote