View Single Post
  #42  
Old 01-06-2015, 07:23 PM
Peter.M's Avatar
Peter.M
Registered User

Peter.M is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 953
Quote:
Originally Posted by gaston View Post
Fair comments Peter,

In both cases (with and without the ONAG) the AO-L was used, the difference is only visible versus NIR guidance.
I think the text could be clearer on this matter, thanks for the question I'll complete it eventually.

I agree that the first image shows some elongated stars too, guiding at 14 degrees over the horizon was quite challenging even with the AO-L enabled, this is a bit an extreme situation.
Obviously I would not recommend to do so, the target was chosen so low above the horizon to test the seeing effect on guiding with visible and NIR under bad conditions.
But even if you correct for the star elongations there is still a significant difference using visible or NIR for auto-guiding (same scope, AO, and target).
I appreciate your clarification, just the way it was presented it seemed like you were not using the AO-L in the first image.
Reply With Quote