Thread: Filters
View Single Post
  #10  
Old 30-08-2013, 07:04 AM
PRejto's Avatar
PRejto (Peter)
Registered User

PRejto is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Rylstone, NSW, Australia
Posts: 1,398
Well, I'm just going through this exercise myself and I'm going with Baader as a compromise.

First, I think the lum filter Baader offers is IR blocking (which in my case is essential for a refractor). The narrow band filters also seem to be a compromise in bandwidth compared to Astronomiks (wide) and Astrodon (quite narrow), and price wise fall into a somewhat middle ground which also makes sense. It didn't hurt that there are some beautiful test photos using a TEC140 with Baader either.)

But, my main reason for going this way over Astronomik is the slight notch between Red/Green to deal with Sodium light pollution which the Astronomik's don't have. The Astrodon filters have this notch (larger!) as well but cost much more. I plan to try either a Hutech or Astronimik CLS light Pollution filter in place of the luminance filter. This combination of filters might provide a reasonable light pollution combination but does not address Mercury LP...

I have tentatively compared both Hutech and Astronomik LP filters using a light box...perhaps not a fair way to compare. Compared to using no filter at all the Hutech takes 2X the exposure length to reach the same adu, the CLS 3.4X (big surprise!)

Peter
Reply With Quote