View Single Post
  #10  
Old 12-01-2020, 12:38 PM
Rainmaker's Avatar
Rainmaker (Matt)
Strictly Visual......

Rainmaker is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: Canberra
Posts: 583
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hijynx View Post
I have what I think is a simple question.

Yes aperture is king etc etc. and yes bigger is better when it comes to visual astronomy but one must consider cost, weight, transport, storage and eyepiece height at zenith. So .......

Is 16” a respectable aperature for viewing DSO with a dob? Is there that much difference at the eyepiece when compared to 18-20”?
16" is a great aperture for DSOs. The next logical step up would be 20"
Once you go past 16" then 2" steps are not that noticeable.
I would rather a excellent 16" than an ok 18 or 20.

There can be a huge variation on the actual bulk of scopes of a similar aperture. A well designed 18 or 20 can be more compact than many commercial 16s.

I would vary the saying to "Good quality aperture is King"
Reply With Quote