Sounds good in theory Greg, but with my scope I would need to get even smaller pixels - ICX834 with 3.1 micron pixels would give me exactly 1"pp, but that means even shallower wells. So big fat pixels on a big scope but that also means heavy (end very pricey!) rig, and I need to set up/down for every session. That's why I need to stick with a light scope = drizzling
FLI 16200 sounds VERY good, maybe in a few years... :-)