View Single Post
  #14  
Old 25-06-2010, 12:16 PM
bloodhound31
Registered User

bloodhound31 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,628
Quote:
Originally Posted by troypiggo View Post
Oooh, good choices with the 16-35 and 100L

I'll stick my last post, 135L and 85 f/1.8 for portrait recommendations. You should get both for around/under $2k. Only doubt for me is if you consider them to be a bit close in FL to the 100L, but that's for you to decide. The 100L can do things they can't (macro), but they're faster.

Food for thought
Are you saying the 100mm macro can be used as a portrait lens?
Reply With Quote