View Single Post
  #16  
Old 22-06-2015, 09:16 PM
rmuhlack's Avatar
rmuhlack (Richard)
Professional Nerd

rmuhlack is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Strathalbyn, SA
Posts: 916
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shiraz View Post
Thanks very much Richard - yes, I followed that up and their paper is my reference in post 4 - Eden's thread was nice happenstance, since I hadn't been able to find anything else.

you have just moved from OSC to mono - do you have any feel for the relative sensitivities of OSC and mono? - ie do you think that it is reasonable to assign a QE to OSC of about 1/3 that of a mono chip?
using your formula to compare my own equipment, i think a DSLR QE of 0.2 seems too generous (at least for my 1000D) when comparing its relative sensitivity with that of the ST10. After playing with the numbers in my spreadsheet here i'm inclined to think that a DSLR QE of 0.1 to 0.15 is a better match to my own anecdotal observations.
Reply With Quote