|
okay, so an image just came to mind. Gravity isn't a displacement force but the image in space/time of a contractual force. Thus a neutron star which is significantly more weighter (contracted) but smaller than the sun has significantly more gravity.
(hmm, just noticed a potential problem with that idea, and that is that the image would be retained where the contraction took place rather than follow the object around. Unless space/time is of a different quality to physical objects. Like the point of time of the contraction follows the object. who knows).
yes/no?
|