View Single Post
  #19  
Old 07-03-2019, 03:18 AM
glend (Glen)
Registered User

glend is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Lake Macquarie
Posts: 7,048
Quote:
Originally Posted by Astronovice View Post
Thank you Greg,

Your comments are most helpful.

Am I right in assuming that Hoya FCD100 and Ohara FPL53 are broadly equivalent?

Calvin
It depends on how broadly you want to define equivalent.

FPL-53 offers almost indistinguishable performance compared to Fluorite/CaF2, in an astronomical refractor, it’s more stable, has better physical characteristics, cost far less, and it's environmentally better to work with. FPL-53 has an Abbe number of 94.99 .
FCD-100. The relatively new Extra Low Dispersion Hoya FCD-100 glass has an Abbe number of 94.66 compared to 94.99 of S-FPL53.
To most, if not all eyes using it visually, Flourite, FPL-53, and FCD-100, will appear to be the same. FCD-100 is more cost effective currently, but many astronomers buy on reputation, even if they cannot visually tell the difference, and Flourite and FPL-53 continue to sit at the top in people minds.
Reply With Quote