Quote:
Originally Posted by mswhin63
It is true that OSC would be easier, it really depends to what degree you images will end up. I kinda think OSC CCD element design is improving so it may be in a practical sense negligable. I was hoping someone might know on a practicle level the difference as technical techies can be a bit over the top  |
Well I was looking purely from a practical level. Darrel has experience in planetary RGB which is different. He also used a DSLR which is OSC. For DSO you do need to put in the time in subs to get the data. If he has a semi permanent set-up then yeah go mono all the way. As Fred and others pointed out, better QE & resolution (no doubt, there's no bayer matrix). Now I use a QHY8 and I did dabble a bit in narrowband. For me
and I stress for me it is a real pain. I don't use a filter wheel and I'm always on the go. That's why I can't see myself having the time or patience to use a mono. I wouldn't complete
anything.
May be when I retire and get and Obs
