Quote:
Originally Posted by Omaroo
Oh, that's right - you had a D50. Hmmm... we need to do a more direct comparison - one between two cameras of similar age and similar specification between the two brands.
If I get a D300 soon (hopefully wait a bit and go a D3) that'd be a better match to the 40D - they compete in the same market segment, i.e. high-end consumer, semi pro.
I'd do one with the D40 - except I'm not sure what the equivalent Canon is... I suppose the 400D, which is quite a bit more expensive. What IS Canons' entry-level offering these days?
|
D40x would be close to the 400D. I personally don't like Nikon's new series at all. They don't feel like real cameras to me, and feel like fischer price toys. I loved my D50...sturdy, reliable, and very low noise. It could most likely compete against a D300 if it had 1/3 ISO stops.