Quote:
Originally Posted by h0ughy
so where is the PI colour version Professor Pixel?????
very much improved
|
Patience young one. Wax on, wax off
Quote:
Originally Posted by RickS
Looks great, Allan!
Drizzle works very well for large amounts of undersampled data. I've been using it for about a year with data from SRO (2 arcsec/pixel image scale and seeing round 1 arcsec on good nights.)
Cheers,
Rick.
|
Thought that I would give it a trial as I don't use PI in my workflow at all, but I'm slowly realising that I should.
Allan
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bassnut
Stunning (apparent) res and sharpness.
Question: why doesnt everyone capture bin 2 or 3 and then drizzle?.
|
Don't know to be honest
Quote:
Originally Posted by RobF
Nicely done. What scope were you shooting for this again please Allan?
|
Thanks Rob. It was a 5" refractor with fl of 950mm
Quote:
Originally Posted by RickS
Good question, Fred.
My take on this is that Drizzle isn't perfect. If you Drizzle up to twice the resolution with good, undersampled data then you don't get quite as good a result as you would have from pixels that were half the size. A small amount of spatial information is lost.
Although Drizzle seems like magic, it isn't. It's just trading off resolution against SNR. That may not be obvious from looking at a Drizzled image because Drizzle introduces correlated noise that isn't as visually intrusive.
Cheers,
Rick.
|
Thanks for that explanation Rick
Quote:
Originally Posted by RobC
Looks good Alan. So what is drizzle integration ?
Rob
|
What he said
The process is described in detail here.
http://pixinsight.com/forum/index.php?topic=7151.0
Hope this helps
Allan