|
Interesting to read your results Paul. I don’t have or use Photoshop so have only suspected (with good reason!) that these ‘super details’ in some recent Astro photos are artifacts added to images, drawn from whatever has trained the AI processing routine. Isn’t the end point then that you could take a picture of M8 (say) and then the AI, trained on a Hubble M8, could just whack in details that might be correct but barley related to what data has been captured? I could imagine it’d be easy to write some program that could scour the web for every pic of M8 and interpolate as required. No point to this of course but such a scenario would blur the line between plagiarizing and processing: you’d be plagiarizing every image not one or two perhaps?
|