View Single Post
  #7  
Old 14-03-2019, 08:18 AM
gregbradley's Avatar
gregbradley
Registered User

gregbradley is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 17,907
Quote:
Originally Posted by JA View Post
Hi Greg,

If photographic lenses are not out of the question for you then, around the focal length range you've indicated (~500mm in your examples) there are a few quality (used) manual lenses you could consider, which:
1. fall within your weight limit,
2. include (by design) a flatterner and
3. are faster (or could be used stopped down for even better IQ).

Unless of course, telescope it must be. In which case: Back to normal programming -

Best
JA
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ukastronomer View Post
I have this I keep handy

https://www.widescreen-centre.co.uk/...s-pro-ota.html

Though if I didn't have the 120 version of this I would not dismiss it, one of the best reviews around for scopes are the Esprit triplets not on your list

https://www.widescreen-centre.co.uk/...telescope.html

I think that unlike us conned in the UK YOU get the FREE field Flatterer, we have to pay for it

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5WNeHM2lqDU
Thanks for that. These ads though are worded so vaguely I always feel they are lying.

3 ED elements but not named. OK one is FPL53 what are the others? F5 is tough for FPL53 so it would need something else.
No mention of the corrected imaging circle so I assume its too small otherwise they would tout it.

Crass sort of marketing really where they try to spin an image of perfection without saying a lot about the actual specs. I don't know about you but I won't make a decision based on sketchy data.

Greg.
Reply With Quote