Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Haese
Dave the 1600 is about 1.27" per pixel but has 1.2e read noise. The 71 on the other hand is about 1.6" per pixel and has 2.3e read noise. I still think the 1600 is good. Either is probably a nice camera.
|
thanks Paul, was looking at real estate but i can see your point but its only 12bit where the other is 14bit. arrggg this is where it gets hard what do you trade off? the other is well depth, the 1600 is 20k where the other one is 48.6k