View Single Post
  #14  
Old 13-11-2018, 09:46 PM
RickS's Avatar
RickS (Rick)
PI cult recruiter

RickS is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 10,584
Quote:
Originally Posted by Atmos View Post
The depth that can be achieved on dusty regions and the like can in some ways be less aperture related and more a function of aperture area and resolution. This is what makes the FSQ106 and KAF-16803 such a powerful instrument combination as Mike can attest to. Large pixels and F/5 sucks up photons and makes capturing fainter dust a breeze.
Indeed, Colin! The "aperture rules" maxim is simplistic twaddle. What determines SNR is how many photons you can pack into each pixel. A small scope with a fast f/ratio in combination with a camera with large pixels works very well if what you care about is image depth (as opposed to resolution.)

My depth record currently stands at 27.6 mag/arcsec^2:

http://www.iceinspace.com.au/forum/s...d.php?t=114782

Cheers,
Rick.
Reply With Quote