Quote:
Originally Posted by snowyskiesau
Mostly the camera will be used for landscapes, wildlife, that sort of thing so
any lenses I get should be suited for that.
It's just an advantage if they are also suited to astrophotography as well.
The 50mm 1.8 is on the shopping list. Still deciding between a 135mm f2 and the
70-200mm f/4L both are about the same price but the latter might be a better choice for the non astro stuff.
Mind you, it does have a wider FOV than the 135.
Can't afford both dammit!
(And iceman's latest posting from Kulnura shows what a lower cost lens can do - in the hands of someone who knows how to use it.)
|
http://www.photozone.de/8Reviews/index.html
Good review site for many lenses
Maybe that will help your decision or drive you mad with exponential options!!
Cheers
Doug
