Quote:
Originally Posted by gregbradley
I would disagree that TECs and APMs are in the same league as AP. They are simply not. TEC are no match for AP. TEC are optimised for green and red and blue are not as good. AP does not optimise just for green.
AP has a large range of imaging accessories, TEC does not. AP focusers, fittings, adapters are all heavy duty and flex and so on is simply unheard of. Not true for other brands including Tak (surprisingly). So Tak can let you down occasionally (read the large number of threads about flex in FSQ scopes). They are out to Version 4 now of the FSQ and probably still haven't gotten on top of it. They got the optics right but not the mechanicals.
AP is still the premium brand in my opinion. Roland actually images and that makes all the difference.
But yes high end 2nd tier is more fully fleshed out now.
Greg.
|
Greg (and anyone else):
What do you think of the CFF's? Are they as good optically as the AP's?
Thank you.
William